Santa Monica Redux

27 Apr
2016

IMG_1494

Somehow it’s been nearly four years since we visited Santa Monica and raved about the bike-related stuff going on there.  A meeting at UCLA provided a good reason to stick around for the weekend and see what was new on the Westside.  We rented bikes in Venice Beach and pedaled the dedicated beach bike path up to Santa Monica to Tongva Park across from City Hall.  It was still under construction during our last visit, but the finished park, featuring the oblong observation decks shown above and below, is an incredible improvement over the former parking lot at the site.  The LA Times interviewed the landscape architect who designed the park (and the High Line in Manhattan).

IMG_1532

Tongva Park is a peaceful oasis from the bustling streets outside, with winding paths, water features trickling in the background and water-wise landscaping throughout.   The google images for the park are way better than anything I took.

City Hall is located just east of the park and the arrangement reminded me of Waterfront Park at the County Administration Building here.  The traffic calming they’ve done on the street dividing the two in Santa Monica sure would be appreciated on both Harbor and Pacific Highway however.

IMG_1464

IMG_1471

 

IMG_1479

Just to the north is Colorado Boulevard, where the Expo Line Extension terminus station at 4th Ave will open next month when the Extension makes its debut (check out this video of the route).  The station looks about complete but the street’s pedestrian esplanade was still under construction – the curved pavers make it look like it’s undulating, but it’s just an optical illusion.  Not pictured here are the two new large residential projects going in.  Their building heights are far above the 30′ limit that Bay Park residents have imposed on any development near the forthcoming Mid-Coast trolley stations.

IMG_1517

 


IMG_1523

The station is just a block away from the southern end of Santa Monica’s 3rd Street Promenade, which was busy as usual:

IMG_1514

While we didn’t do the entire 26 miles of the beach bike path, it sure is nice to have pedestrian traffic separated from the bike lane.  Too bad Coronado won’t allow a beach bike path, and the Pacific/Mission Beach boardwalk isn’t wide enough to permit dedicated uses.

IMG_1536

That’s not the only place where LA’s common sense trumps San Diego’s entrenched entitlement.  We made our way home Sunday and stopped into Hermosa Beach, where 24-hour parking and residential parking permits stand in stark contrast to Pacific Beach resident and business demands to keep all parking free despite overwhelming demand.  Here’s a car-free view of Hermosa Beach:

IMG_1575

Next we visited the Anaheim Packing District, a former citrus processing facility built in 1919 that’s been converted into a food hall.  LAist has a ton of photos from the opening in 2014.

IMG_1580

IMG_1594

IMG_1593

IMG_1584

IMG_1592

We still haven’t been to Liberty Station’s Public Market but the Anaheim version’s wide range of food and drink options was quite a surprise given the location.  Maybe there is hope for the OC.

 

Comment Form

Kindred

15 Apr
2016

IMG_1367

Kindred opened a few months ago in the former Alchemy spot in South Park, after they opened up this walled-off space to the street. With crazy design input from owner Kory Stetina, filtered through Paul Basile (who created the various Consortium Holdings interiors – they’re on board here too), the restaurant and bar don’t quite look like your typical San Diego establishment:

IMG_1366

IMG_1365

IMG_1358

IMG_1360

That last framed picture is on display in the mens room. But enough about the design – how’s Kindred’s all-vegan menu? If our brunch items are any indication, it’s one of the best in town. The price point is lower than Cafe Gratitude in Little Italy (and you don’t have to say “I am Grateful” or whatever the name of your dish is) and the flavors are bold. I haven’t had many vegan breakfasts in San Diego so there’s not a whole lot to compare to… maybe Naked Cafe many years ago, or the buckwheat pancakes at Swami’s in North Park. But this plate of pancakes (“Carmelized Banana, Bourbon Butterscotch, Whipped Coconut Cream, Walnuts, Syrup”) was amazingly delicious – this plate was soon empty:

IMG_1357

Banana bread french toast looked really good:

IMG_1353

Jay’s tofu scramble (“Spicy Horseradish Hash Browns, Romesco, Chioggia Beets, Avocado, Sourdough Toast, Chile Lime Butter”) was also surprisingly tasty:

IMG_1356

We sampled a few appetizers too, including the fried potato bread (“Soy Cream, Blackberry Jam, Mango, Mint, Fresno Chili”):

IMG_1352

Given all my dietary issues I can’t remember the last time I was able to order items like these without paying for it later.
The cocktail list looked really interesting, but I hadn’t had my coffee fix yet, so the Modern Times iced coffee on tap was the perfect accompaniment to breakfast. We’re hoping to get back to Kindred soon to see if their dinners match the high bar they’ve set at brunch.

IMG_1368

4 Responses to Kindred

Avatar

Dobbson

April 16th, 2016 at 1:57 am

Been meaning to go here. Never would have considered it for breakfast, but now I’m on board.

Congratulations for a well thought out post where I learned something new and exciting about SD Urban neighborhoods and what they have to offer.

Avatar

Maggie

April 16th, 2016 at 6:09 am

I’m really curious to read your review when you go for dinner!

Avatar

Joe

April 30th, 2016 at 1:34 pm

Wow. Kindred looks crazy, in the best possible ways. Thanks for the narrative and excellent photos!

Avatar

paul jamason

May 2nd, 2016 at 10:23 am

You’re welcome Joe. I like how Kindred really went for something completely different on the design. A lot of restaurants (understandably) play it safe and copy whatever the current trends are.

Comment Form

Art of the Open Air

7 Mar
2016

The San Diego Museum of Art installed several sculptures in Balboa Park’s Plaza de Panama last month for their “Art of the Open Air” exhibit, and I finally got over there recently to check them out. Here’s a few of the pieces:

IMG_0895

IMG_0892

IMG_0888

Slowly but surely this is turning into a great civic space, and it started with Mayor Filner ignoring the howls over removing any parking. And despite it being a very busy Sunday in the park, the parking lots across Park Boulevard had hundreds of spaces available, with tram service picking up visitors. Why not charge for parking in the prime lots inside Balboa Park and use the revenue to increase tram service frequency to the remote lots? Or use the money toward repairing the hundreds of millions of dollars of decaying infrastructure in the Park? It’s odd that we accept demand-based pricing throughout the private sector (e.g., Uber) but insist that all public resources be free when tax revenues are insufficient.

Pappalecco opened just down the street from us here in Kensington, and it’s great to see the eastern end of Adams Ave in Kensington finally getting some foot traffic after all these quiet years. We’ve mostly had gelato and coffee so far but the cafe/restaurant is clearly a hit, with pizzas selling out on opening day. And with Cucina Sorella opening soon in the former Fish Public space, sleepy Kensington may finally be waking up.

IMG_0883

IMG_0866

    Transit items:

  • As transit agencies in other cities implement mobile payment systems, making it easier to ride, San Diego still doesn’t have stored value on the Compass Card (i.e., putting $20 on the card to use as needed). Bus riders still need exact change – $2.25 – to ride. Circulate SD posted a form you can fill out asking MTS to implement this long-overdue feature.
  • California finally removes a long-standing obstacle to transit-oriented development: the auto “Level of Service” requirement in CEQA:

    Now, instead of evaluating a project by traffic congestion, cities will instead ask whether that project will make people drive more — a truly negative environmental impact. This change will remove one of the biggest barriers to infill and transit-oriented development. It will finally reflect the fact that these projects are better for the environment, because they enable people to take shorter trips and go by foot, bike, bus and rail.

  • San Diego has one of the shortest average commute times in the U.S. So why is every development near public transit attacked by those complaining about traffic congestion?
  • The city is opening up its data to the public. Want to know which parking meters in the city are most heavily used, yet still have the same pricing as those used the least? Request these data be prioritized for release at the link above.
  • SANDAG has an open house for the Landis Bikeway in North Park next Wednesday at 6 PM. And stay tuned for a SANDAG Bikeways presentation for the bike community later this month. Previous presentations have included a whole lot of talk about street parking, and not much about the bike lanes themselves.
  • The SR-15 bikeway had its groundbreaking last week. Caltrans will present the project to the Kensington-Talmadge Planning Group at 7:30 PM Wednesday. Here’s a rendering of the path:Screen Shot 2016-03-05 at 8.58.05 PM
    Housing items:

  • As I mentioned in my last post, San Diego was recently named the second-most expensive housing metro in the nation:MW-EH068_home_s_20160303112951_ZHLocal urban planner Howard Blackson gives his ideas on how to address San Diego’s housing crisis.
  • A workshop last Saturday at the New School of Architecture in East Village brainstormed ideas on the future of the neighborhood’s southern area – namely, the blocks east of Petco Park that the Chargers have their eye on for a new stadium. Each table at the workshop came up with their own ideas, including a UC San Diego campus in the easternmost part of the neighborhood, with a green-space connector to the library. Architect Rob Quigley named the convention center and hotel bay front wall as the “biggest planning blunder in San Diego”, and offered his own sketch for south East Village: an oblong, fish-shaped green space surrounded by buildings with curving facades to complement the park.
  • Some spare time before a recent dentist appointment in Bankers Hill (thanks to my MTS route 11 bus) enabled some quick pics of ongoing development there, including Vue on Fifth:
    IMG_0922

    … and Fourth Avenue Lofts:
    IMG_0925

10 Responses to Art of the Open Air

Avatar

Steven Johnson

March 7th, 2016 at 6:39 pm

always love what you pull together

Avatar

Jeff Micklos

March 8th, 2016 at 2:39 pm

Having just moved into Kensginton, I noticed how mean shuttered businesses line Adams in the heart of kensington. The business compound that houses Clems is pretty much completely vacant and just east by Pappalecco is pretty much a wasteland of seemingly failed businesses. I really appreciate your insight into matters like this so I thought I’d ask you: what gives? When did this happen? Why did this happen? Is there a way out?

It seems like there is so much business real estate not being levereged in the neighborhood, really bums me out.

Avatar

SD Urban

March 8th, 2016 at 5:09 pm

Thanks Steven!

Hi Jeff, welcome to the neighborhood. The Clems area seems to have always been that way since we moved here in 2000 – the tasting room is a big improvement over the “bookstore” that was there though IMO. The art gallery next door to Pappalecco is fairly new.

Overall it probably dates back to the 1960’s when all of these Uptown neighborhoods stopped walking to their main street businesses in favor of driving to Mission Valley. It’s been a slow comeback since the 1990’s. Eastern Adams is sort of the end of the line too. My suggestion would be to add housing above the one-story businesses, but there would be a lot of resistance to that.

Avatar

Dobbson

March 8th, 2016 at 8:00 pm

Look how cheap Portland is, folks! Start peddling and you can make it there before mosquito season.

They’re probably even silly enough up there to allow someone to seriously create an oblong fish shaped green space.

Sorry about your loss. That area by the convention center is getting a big, fat, stadium with a big fat parking lot. It’s called the “Citizen’s Initiative” but you already know this since you cherry pick reddit for your content. And I was just kidding about being sorry. Clearly a park shaped like a giant tuna makes more sense.

Avatar

Dobbson

March 10th, 2016 at 2:36 pm

Hey! Relevant info here. And great news at that!

http://goo.gl/gSjumR

Thank you, millennials, for all that you do. All the rage, all the social justice and all the hypocrisy!

Avatar

Dobbson

March 12th, 2016 at 2:49 am

Quick question for the author of the post…

Why does sleepy Kensington need to wake up? How about the thousand other hot places in town? Just because you live there, it should become more active? Maybe people moved there to settle down and live out their lives in peace and quiet, perhaps having done the “scene” back in the day.

You should move to Little Italy. They need a social justice warrior like you. Trust me, Kensington does not need a refresh, modernization, more shops, night life, etc. It’s been doing fine without you trumpeting its age and value to lazy millennials.

Avatar

awkward

March 21st, 2016 at 10:16 pm

This Dobbson person sounds like sore loser with too much time on their hands.

I’m a life-long San Diegan and appreciate your work towards making San Diego a better place to live, with more commuting and lifestyle options to a more diverse population.

Unfortunately, San Diego will always have these Dobbson types who lucked out with cheap housing in the 1970s, pay little in property tax, and are unwilling to give up their slice of paradise to anyone.

They are largely ignorant and uneducated on topics of urban planning. Especially when they fail to realize that San Diego’s poor infrastructure is thanks to the limited amount of property taxes they pay. They already finished their careers, so it doesn’t matter that high housing costs drive away businesses and stifle entrepreneurship.

Everyone must bow down to the 1970s midwest transplant in his 3 bedroom suburban home. -___- I’m just waiting for this generation to pass on so we can finally address some of the major problems that San Diego has.

Avatar

Dobbson

March 23rd, 2016 at 8:32 am

Couldn’t be more wrong. But you must be used to that by now. I don’t have property to give up. You’re probably older than I am. Boasting of being a life-long San Diegan means absolutely nothing besides your misguided sense of entitlement. People who moved here yesterday have just as much day as you do. Waiting for a generation to die is patently ignorant.

Avatar

Dobbson

March 25th, 2016 at 2:08 am

If I’m to believe what awkward says, the solution here is death. Let’s watch all the elders die so we can be in charge.

Solid plan. Typical millennial solution. Let’s just wait til it dies then we can make it ours!

The urban and suburban planning of these neighborhoods existed long before you babies decided to try and change everything. That old money is going to win. Every. Single. Time.

Paul. If Kensington is too boring for you, bail! Go find your craft food/beer/bike utopia somewhere that actually gives a shit. It’s not going to be the busiest spots in San Diego, that’s a fact.

Avatar

Paul Jay

March 28th, 2016 at 5:38 pm

Dobbson: Did you ever take a moment to think why people would like to make improvements to their neighborhoods? Have you spend time lived in cities that actually have neighborhoods where you can take care of daily needs and not have to drive across town to another neighborhood? San Diego has 1.3 million people, yet downtown barely qualifies as a livable neighborhood compared to the many other cities I’ve lived in. San Diego and its neighborhoods have a long way to go if you asked me. I live here now and I would like to see the improvements the owner of this site writes about because I miss living in a populated city not just with trendy businesses to patronize, but with true options for daily living. I’m not a millennial (over 40), make a decent living where I can afford a house in the neighborhood of my choice (North Park) but am honestly considering leaving after 2 years because the city just doesn’t offer what a host of other cities I’ve lived in offer in interesting housing, transport, complete neighborhoods, good schools in my own neighborhood where my son could ride to on his own, I could go on… but how about you reconsider repeatedly attacking people that are dedicated to improving their city and do something constructive yourself? Calling a certain age group “babies” and “lazy” is not helpful at all. And btw, I lived in Portland for 7 years and and there’s no mosquito season. Let the attacks on me begin.

Comment Form

“There are plenty of places in San Diego where it’s easy to park but you wouldn’t want to go to. In every great city of the world parking is a challenge.” – Marco Limandri, Chief Executive Officer of the Little Italy Association, December 2014

The Downtown Mobility Plan, a transit-oriented plan to help promote walking and cycling in the city “would just be detrimental to our community and to downtown san Diego as a whole (due to street parking impacts)” – Christopher Gomez, District Manager of the Little Italy Association, March 2016

Here we go again. After the Hillcrest Business Association successfully lobbied SANDAG to kill most of the Uptown Bikeway in Hillcrest, the Little Italy Association (LIA) – a group composed of the parking district, businesses and residents in the area – is demanding Civic San Diego remove all proposed bike lanes in the Downtown Mobility Plan from the core of Little Italy. Protected lanes would be removed from Grape, Hawthorne, State and Cedar. The Pacific Highway lane would remain, and Cedar would be moved to Ash.

The Downtown Mobility Plan still *adds* street parking to Little Italy via angled and head-in parking conversions:

“It should be noted that the plan would increase parking in the Little Italy neighborhood, but not to the extent that they are proposing. You may also note that the recently completed 600 space County Parking Garage at Beech Street and Kettner Boulevard is available to the public on evenings and weekends.” – Brad Richter, Civic San Diego

The net loss of additional on-street spaces is approximately 50 (Gomez refers to these as “also an additional 50 spaces lost”, which is incorrect). This pales in comparison to the brand new 640 space parking garage the County built – a $36 million parking subsidy provided by taxpayers – plus the 55 new public spaces planned for Piazza Famiglia. The controversy proves that no matter how many parking spaces are provided to business districts, they will just keep demanding more. Meanwhile, our parking districts refuse to maximize existing street parking through methods used in other cities (and our own Port District): demand-based parking meter pricing, extending meter hours into the evening, and additional meters.

The Downtown Mobility Plan makes downtown safer for pedestrians and bicyclists through improvements like the one shown below:

IMG_0836

To call safe bike lanes and walking promenades like the one shown above “detrimental to all of downtown San Diego” is stunningly out of touch with the city’s Vision Zero pedestrian safety efforts. It’s galling to me since my husband was car-doored while biking on unsafe streets downtown and spent 2 nights in the trauma unit. And providing safe bike lanes has repeatedly been shown to increase business. We can set aside a small portion of some Little Italy’s streets for safe bike access, while still providing abundant street and off-street parking.

At the Mobility Plan workshop, LIA Parking District director Luke Vinci implied that cheap private car storage for wealthy North County patrons should be the top priority for our public streets – because drivers circle around for free parking, instead of paying to park in lots and garages. I couldn’t disagree more, especially since the Mobility Plan was created in part to increase bike and walk travel mode shares for the city’s Climate Action Plan (CAP). The city is legally required to meet its CAP greenhouse gas reduction goals. Removing all bike lanes from the core of Little Italy isn’t how you increase bike mode share. And Vinci went out of his way to ridicule bike ridership counts on the 5th Ave buffered bike lane in Bankers Hill – despite it removing no parking and causing no congestion.

LIA’s actions are part of a disturbing trend by the city’s parking/business districts and community planning groups to undermine San Diego’s Climate Action Plan goals. I contacted the city’s Sustainability Manager to ask if they could perform outreach to these groups, and they indicated this has already happened. Therefore these city-affiliated organizations are knowingly and willfully defying San Diego’s established Climate Action Plan policies – as global warming goes into overdrive.

The LIA board voted unanimously against the Downtown Mobility Plan, including board member Catt White, who runs the Little Italy Mercato farmers market. This was particularly frustrating, since I and many others personally donated to her failed Barrio Logan Public Market. And White’s Mercato removes many street parking spaces from Little Italy every Saturday:

IMG_0945

IMG_0944

So: a private business can remove public parking spaces. And that same business owner can prevent any spaces from being removed for safety, mobility and city policy.

Maybe it’s time to rethink the power we’re handing over to business districts, when these districts act directly against the city and taxpayers. The New Republic had a good writeup on abuse of power by some of these districts.

– Thanks to everyone who voted at Uptown Planners last week, voting in pro-housing candidates Maya Rosas and Soheil Nakhshab. Lots of residents who oppose housing for others turned out, but were matched in number by those who support a more inclusive Uptown for all incomes (San Diego was recently named the second most unaffordable housing metro in the nation) and travel modes:

CchJzvuWwAAUF3C

Pro-housing/transit candidates receiving 200+ votes in Uptown is unheard of and really impressive. While results were a mixed bag overall, Uptown Planners will no longer be nearly unified in opposing the Climate Action Plan’s housing and transit goals in Uptown.

4 Responses to Little Italy fights Downtown Mobility Plan

Avatar

Dobbson

March 6th, 2016 at 11:47 pm

Well, looks like you’re going to have to stop covering Little Italy on your blog from now on too! I applaud the business owners for standing their ground. Their success is dependent on people being able to drive down and park. They really don’t care about you clowns on your bikes and with each neighborhood shutting out your precious bike lanes, it’s clear the majority is against you.

You should go to their next meeting and interrupt and speak out of turn. I hear that drives positive results. Or, brilliant idea, may you should run for office and try to be a part of the changes you want to see instead of moaning about it from your keyboard.

For the remainder of your life, bicyclists will be seen as a transportation novelty. No amount of bike lanes or corridors will change that. Ever. Unless you are in Amsterdam, or maybe remote parts of Asia where cars haven’t been invented yet, this will always be the case. Autos will dominate forever. To believe otherwise is delusional and absurd.

Avatar

Karen Kohl

March 7th, 2016 at 9:09 am

No one is saying bicycles will dominate San Diego. But why shut out those who choose an alternative form of transportation? In fact we’re HELPING the many issues associated with autos in San Diego. If we get off the highways and roads in our autos it makes room for closed minded people like yourself to drive their autos. There are also countless studies that decreasing lanes leads to more efficient traffic flow. Just Google it, clown!

Avatar

Rick Landavazo

March 7th, 2016 at 7:47 pm

Clown Dobbson: Parking is limited, finite, in SD’s urban core communities. You can not make another Mission Valley out of Hillcrest, North, South Park, Little Italy and so on no matter how much you try. Not possible. Massive parking lots and parking structures will ruin these neighborhoods and the market value of their community character. These community business owners are nothing without local customers, and that includes, more and more, those that arrive on bicycles. Get over it Bozo.

Avatar

Dobbson

March 8th, 2016 at 7:49 pm

I love it. It’s heart warming to read about more and more neighborhoods snuffing out the fantasy dream of a bicycle utopia. I don’t even need to pick your delusional posts apart… the truth is evident and speaks for itself. Pretty soon you all are just going to be riding around in circles in North Park. That is until they get fed up with you entitled morons as well.

Studies can show anything they want. Someone should do a study in San Diego about who wants more parking vs bike lanes. Though it’s not actually necessary since the actions are already showing what people think.

Can’t wait to see which is the next neighborhood to literally kick you all to the curb. It’s an exciting time to be alive.

Comment Form

The density and height limit debates have been going on in Uptown for eight years now, and they’ve come to a head with the long-delayed update to the 1988 Uptown Community Plan. The Plan will determine zoning for decades to come throughout Hillcrest, Bankers Hill, Mission Hills and University Heights. The current Plan proposed by the city reduces densities throughout much of Uptown versus the 1988 Plan. The main exception is the commercial core of Hillcrest, where densities would remain the same:

Screen Shot 2016-02-27 at 4.52.13 PM

Uptown Planners narrowly rejected this proposal at a recent special meeting, and instead re-affirmed their own proposal, which would greatly reduce densities and building heights in west Hillcrest. For more background, please see this Uptown News summary of the meeting. As part of their excellent coverage of this issue, they also published a piece written by a representative of west Hillcrest’s commercial property owners, who have been advised to sell their properties if Uptown Planners’ recommended downzoning (109 dwelling units/acre to 44) and height reductions (150-200 feet to 50/65) for their properties are approved. (Imagine investing millions in a commercial property to then have its value halved by the local planning committee.) As a result, these properties would likely remain parking lots and one-story retail instead of vibrant mixed-use developments and a potential boutique hotel.

The city’s Climate Action Plan legally requires the city to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by increasing walking, biking and public transit use in urban neighborhoods like Uptown. Its proposal for west Hillcrest simply continues the zoning needed for transit-oriented development in the area. Mixed-use commercial and residential developments won’t pencil out at current land values unless we continue existing heights and densities in the area.

Many middle class San Diegans can’t afford to live in an increasingly expensive Uptown due to the lack of new housing in the neighborhood. To keep Uptown diverse and vibrant, I believe we need to accommodate residents of all ages and incomes. One way to do this is to support this slate of candidates up for the seven open board seats at next Tuesday’s Uptown Planners meeting:

ElectionMarch1-CLR

These candidates support preserving Uptown’s historic residential areas while working with the city to meet its Climate Action Plan goals on transit corridors.

As the flyer points out, Uptown’s issues aren’t limited to just density. They include walkability, infrastructure for people on foot and bikes, and various quality of life issues. Both Joshua Clark and Maya Rosas have been endorsed by BikeSD for their support of safer streets. I know both of them personally, having met Maya through her complete streets advocacy work for Circulate SD, and Joshua for his bike lane planning work on the Pershing Bikeway in North Park. Another candidate on the above slate, Judy Tentor, volunteers her time for the San Diego Bike Coalition.

Given the importance of Uptown’s Community Plan, please consider voting on Tuesday at 6PM at the Joyce Beers Center at The Hub in Hillcrest. Thanks for taking the time to think about what Uptown’s future holds for current homeowners *and* renters/future residents who face affordability challenges. Next I’ll go into my usual long-winded detail on the issues involved, so feel free to bail out now.

* * *

I appreciate that every Uptown Planners board member and candidate is willing to volunteer their time for a four year term. Obviously they care about their neighborhoods to be this engaged – if only more San Diegans were! But as someone who’s long been interested in urban planning, complete streets and progressive issues such as affordable housing, I just disagree with what some of the candidates’ priorities.

The flyer for the anti-density slate of candidates states that “parking and traffic” are their top priorities. But most of these candidates already own homes in Uptown, so they’re not affected by the region’s housing unaffordability crisis. In fact, they’ve enjoyed large home appreciation gains in part by making it harder to build new housing.

Uptown Planning Chair Jim Mellos probably summed up this viewpoint best when he said that as a third-generation Mission Hills resident, I disagree with people who moved here recently” who want more housing in Uptown.
To me, this implies only established residents get to decide who lives in Uptown, because their traffic concerns trump housing for others. Mellos also said we need to “keep density low until staff finds a solution to the traffic situation” – while offering no solution. Uptown homeowners deserve to have a strong voice, but certainly not the final say over neighborhood zoning when it conflicts with the city’s Climate Action Plan and state affordable housing laws. In fact, the CAP precludes community group downzoning in Transit Priority zones like Hillcrest.

Other anti-density candidates say they support “smart growth with infrastructure”, yet don’t specify what that infrastructure is. This really means widening roads and building more parking garages. Yet these measures only worsen congestion through induced demand and more parking capacity, while making streets more unsafe for pedestrians and bicyclists. While these approaches might be justified in a suburban world with no air pollution or climate change challenges, these are terrible planning ideas for real-world, urban Uptown. And with younger Americans driving less, using ride share, and alternative transit modes, why would we apply 1960’s-era planning to Uptown for decades to come?

I’m also concerned about community character and don’t think we should increase density on residential streets, except allowing granny flats and bungalow court-style housing. But our commercial streets can surely allow more density – look at east University Ave. in Hillcrest, a largely car-oriented set of one-story strip malls.

For brevity’s sake I’m skipping the “new housing will always be too expensive” argument the anti-density folks have been using, and just linking to this article that explains why that’s simply not true. Here’s the related roundtable discussion that explores the affordability problem in more detail, including a number of approaches to it. Preventing all new housing is not one of the solutions.

Increased density also corresponds to higher bike mode shares, and one of the most important issues for me has been the lack of safe pedestrian and bike infrastructure in Uptown. Unfortunately Uptown Planners has a mixed record on safe streets. They rejected the SANDAG Uptown Bike Corridor, then after it was removed from University Avenue, supported the concept of a bike corridor there someday. While serving as Uptown Planners board chair, Leo Wilson (who’s running again for the board on the anti-density slate) filed a CEQA lawsuit against the city to remove the buffered bike lane from 5th Avenue . The current chair of Uptown Planners, Jim Mellos, is the attorney on the lawsuit. State law now directs that road diets can no longer be rejected under CEQA, yet the lawsuit lives on. Wilson also opposed any road diets on 4th/5th/6th avenues. Another candidate for Uptown Planners, Tim Gahagan, recently voted for the Uptown Parking District to reject multi-modal projects like the Uptown Bikeway if they cause any loss of parking. This directly contradicts the city’s legal obligations to increase bike mode share under its Climate Action Plan.

When the North Park Planning Committee voted recently to increase density along its rapid bus line, Uptown density opponents noted that west Hillcrest didn’t have a rapid bus line and therefore shouldn’t accept any more density. One suggestion was to move the density proposed for west Hillcrest to Park Boulevard, even as they downzoned the parcel at El Cajon and Park Boulevard:

Screen Shot 2016-02-28 at 12.04.33 AM

In reality, there are actually multiple bus lines that travel through Hillcrest, many of which will be upgraded to semi-rapid status over the next several years. A streetcar is also planned for 6th Avenue. But when Uptown Planners rejected SANDAG’s multi-million dollar investment in the Uptown Bikeway because it removed some street parking, wouldn’t any decision maker question the wisdom of investing future transit funds there? The slate of candidates shown above will work with SANDAG and the city to ensure Uptown residents have a variety of safe, convenient transit options to choose from.

Finally, an argument I often hear is, “San Diego has always been an expensive place to live”, and therefore we should just accept the current unaffordability crisis. While that may be true at the coast, much of Uptown was actually much more affordable 20-30 years ago when the anti-density slate of candidates bought their homes. It’s possible they can’t comprehend the challenges faced by renters and first-time buyers, many of whom face much higher transportation and education costs than previous generations.

Let’s move beyond the priorities of traffic, parking and home value appreciation, to the more important challenges of climate change and housing affordability. We can do this by supporting Uptown Planners candidates who will work to implement San Diego’s Climate Action Plan and transit-oriented development in our neighborhoods.

1 Response to Uptown Planners election this Tuesday

Avatar

Sharon Gehl

February 29th, 2016 at 2:54 pm

Thank you Paul for defending Uptown!!!

Comment Form

top
highrises.com
Ad proceeds go to SD Community Land Trust

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.